Hi Thomas, On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 3:41 PM Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi > > The thing is that this driver builds upon mipi_dbi_dev, which uses > simple_display_pipeline internally. So it might be legitimate to use it > here. Otherwise all the MIPI support from drm_mipi_dbi.c would have to > be duplicated. > > Best regards > Thomas
Thank you for the clarification. Since mipi_dbi relies on the simple display pipeline, I will stick to using mipi_dbi structures for this series. I will proceed with rebasing my work on top of ChenYu's series (which also uses mipi_dbi) to add the standalone driver support. -- Sincerely, Archit Anant
