Hi,

On Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:47:01 +0200
Laura Nao <[email protected]> wrote:

> The DRIVER_GEM_GPUVA feature flag is currently only used to control two
> behaviors within the DRM core:
> - calling  drm_gem_gpuva_init() during
>   GEM object initialization
> - creating the "gpuvas" debugfs entry
> 
> drm_gem_gpuva_init() is a plain INIT_LIST_HEAD() and therefore is cheap
> to run for every GEM object. The DRM_DEBUGFS_GPUVA_INFO macro is only
> referenced by GPU-VA capable drivers, so clearing the feature bit does
> not cause any unrelated drivers to get the "gpuvas" debugfs node. The
> flag doesn't have any relevant purpose (e.g. gating ioctl handlers or MM
> logic) and doesn't provide any practical benefit.
> 
> Remove the flag definition and drop it from all drivers that use it,
> call drm_gem_gpuva_init() unconditionally and clear the driver features
> bit in DRM_DEBUGFS_GPUVA_INFO.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laura Nao <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c             | 3 +--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_drv.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c         | 2 --
>  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c | 1 -
>  drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_drv.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c        | 2 +-
>  include/drm/drm_debugfs.h             | 2 +-
>  include/drm/drm_drv.h                 | 6 ------
>  include/drm/drm_gem.h                 | 3 ---
>  9 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

I took the liberty to queue this one to drm-misc-next even though it
was lacking R-b/A-b from Nouveau/Pvr maintainers because

- it's pretty trivial
- it's been posted more than a month ago
- we need it to make progress on the Tyr side
- if it's broken (I honestly doubt it), we still have a full release
  cycle to revert

Regards,

Boris

Reply via email to