On 6/6/26 12:41 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 10:14 AM Rob Herring <[email protected]> wrote:
[...] >> Well yes, people have a hard time using compatible strings that don't >> sound generic. That's too bad for them. > > OK, so sounds like going forward I should NAK changes to this file and > tell people to just use: > > compatible = "samsung,atna33xc20"; > > ...to mean "Generic Samsung AMOLED panel with power sequencing that > matches atna33xc20" > > Yes, it means that if we find quirks with a specific panel later, it > could possibly be harder to work around them. However, since we have > several ways to identify the panel (via EDID and via DDC) this seems > fairly low risk. You can't perfectly predict the future anyway. Are we going forward with this guidance? I have another laptop with another ATNAxxx panel (ATNA60HR07-0) that I intend to submit a DT for soon Konrad
