On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 08:17:17PM +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > Having said that, there is something going on a bit confusing: commits > "part one" (4a9671a03f2b) and "part two" (ba110db8e1bc) in mainline seem > to have been merged into just the "part two" above in this -rc. Is that > intentional? I am asking because the original removal of the `lib` > folder happened in "part one" in mainline, so I was expecting to have to > point to that one above, but it doesn't exist on its own.
No, that was not intentional - part one got squashed into the part two backport by mistake on my end, which is also why the `lib` removal has no commit of its own to point at. I can revert and re-do if there's interest in that? -- Thanks, Sasha
