On Sun, Aug 2, 2026 at 12:13 AM Sasha Levin <[email protected]> wrote: > > No, that was not intentional - part one got squashed into the part two > backport by mistake on my end, which is also why the `lib` removal has > no commit of its own to point at. > > I can revert and re-do if there's interest in that?
I guess it depends if there is some advantage/clarity by doing so for the future for you, or maintainers, or people using the stable patches etc. -- for me it is fine either way :) i.e. I mostly mentioned it because it seemed odd and other issues could be hiding, e.g. maybe a backporting script somewhere had a bug. Cheers, Miguel
