> openrisc is arch. > opencores is entire org. Are you saying that "Glanda" is this one: > https://www.glanda.com.au/ > and opencores releases entire SoCs, thus they integrate their own IPs > there into final product. I agree though, that opencores should not > define standalone generic compatibles.
Fair, those precedents don't really hold up then. No relation to glanda.com.au, I wasn't even aware of that company. This is just a personal hobby project, not a company or organization. Given that, what would you suggest instead? I'm open to using a board-specific compatible as the primary match as discussed, or whatever naming scheme you'd consider appropriate for an individual's hobby project. Best regards, Leander
