On Wed Sep 2, 2026 at 9:38 PM CEST, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Thu, 3 Sept 2026 at 05:27, Danilo Krummrich <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Wed Sep 2, 2026 at 9:05 AM CEST, Alistair Popple wrote: >> > On 2026-09-02 at 15:21 +1000, Alistair Popple <[email protected]> wrote... >> >> Ok, so just to double check are you happy with an accessor to return >> >> gsp_static_info as well? >> > >> > Still interested in your thoughts here though, just to avoid churn because >> > I'll >> > probably pick the wrong answer :-) >> >> Yeah, exposing that for gpu_name() seems fine. > > Though userspace doesn't probably need this, but we could I suppose.
Yeah, it shouldn't be needed for anything, but I also don't think it hurts and it could be nice to be consistent about the name throughout the different layers.
