On Mon, Sep 14, 2026 at 08:58:26AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2026 at 02:54:56PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > So I still think that "temporarily revoked" is closer to > > invalidate_mappings, with some additional dma-buf documentation to lose > > the expectation that the buffer will become available again. > > It really isn't, there is no expectation her that the importer has to > put things back like with move.
As we discussed with Christian, "move" doesn't have such expectation. https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ Thanks > > From a DMABUF API this is very much just plain revoke. > > Jason
