On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 10:44:45PM -0700, Alan Previn wrote:
> Check for overflow in udelay/usleep_range use in __xe_mmio_wait32
> and pick the correct helper according to the wait time and atomic.
> Implement a similar helper to replace DIV_ROUND_UP for 32-bit CPUs.
> Avoid growing delays becoming intollerably large by capping the
> in-loop wait time.
> 
> v5: - Simplify: don't introduce additional redesign and
>       use min_t with a backoff to cap wait. (Rodrigo).
> v4: - Simplify using poll_timeout_us and poll_timeout_us_atopmic and
>       update all callstack to never use a param for atomic (Jani)
> v3: - Use div64_s64 kernel API for 32-bit vs 64-bit division.
> v2: - Fixed checkpatch failure.
>     - Added helper for 64-bit DIV_ROUND_UP on 32-bit CPU (Shasiko
>       review). Fixed bug max range in usleep_range(Shasiko review)
> 
> Fixes: 5c09bd6ccd41 ("drm/xe/mmio: Move xe_mmio_wait32() to xe_mmio.c")
> Signed-off-by: Alan Previn <[email protected]>
> Assisted-by: Github-Copilot:Claude-Sonnet-5-0

Assisted-by: LLM

is enough nowadays...

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c
> index 7fa18dfcb5a2..c7c37e59dab0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c
> @@ -350,10 +350,11 @@ static int __xe_mmio_wait32(struct xe_mmio *mmio, 
> struct xe_reg reg, u32 mask, u
>                       wait = ktime_us_delta(end, cur);
>  
>               if (atomic)
> -                     udelay(wait);
> +                     udelay(min_t(s64, wait, MAX_UDELAY_MS));
>               else
>                       usleep_range(wait, wait << 1);
> -             wait <<= 1;
> +#define __XE_MMIO_WAIT_MAX_BACKOFF_100MS (100 * USEC_PER_MSEC)

please move this outside of the function...

then Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>

> +             wait = min_t(s64, wait << 1, __XE_MMIO_WAIT_MAX_BACKOFF_100MS);
>       }
>  
>       if (ret != 0) {
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 

Reply via email to