On Fri, Oct 9, 2026 at 3:19 PM Rob Herring <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2026 at 07:05:46AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2026 at 7:41 PM Rob Herring <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > + power-domains = <&pm_domains DOMAIN_B2R2_MCDE>; > > > > > > This patch is in next, but the define is not breaking dt_binding_check. > > > > I screwed up, I forgot the dependency on the new define :( > > > > I asked Ulf to merge the prerequisite which would resolve it: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/CAD++jL=gft9kkzh9t-m8b_pbwrvzc35ttrmn5v238d3528d...@mail.gmail.com/ > > > > Is it very urgent so I should just revert it? I could also just merge > > the single patch adding the defines into the drm-misc tree if > > Ulf is OK with that. > > 'make dt_binding_check' errors out. That kills my bot for anything based > on next which is most patches. > > You could also just remove the define from the example. > > (Note that drm folks require a revert be posted and acked or they will > revert your revert. I learned the hard way.) > > Rob
I have queued up three patches [1] for next from Linus via my pmdomain tree. The patches are also available for you to pull via my immutable dt branch. I assume that should resolve this problem? Kind regards Uffe [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261009-ux500-power-domains-v7-3-rc1-redux-v1-0-5eb1b90bc...@kernel.org/
