On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 02:21:57AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > Why is it so more difficult to do this correctly with CCE when it worked > > without? > It probably didn't work without. ;) I think when DMA was used for > XvPutImage, but not the CCE yet for 2D, then a Sync didn't wait for the > data transfer to actually finish. So it took less CPU waiting, but the > result was potentially incorrect. Indeed, when you called a 2D accel function while DMA was in progress, it caused a total system lockup. Still, the CPU load is a too high price to pay, there must be another way.
> If the CPU usage is really a problem, an interrupt is probably the way
> to go; don't know if and how the chip supports that though.
Sounds good.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Peter Surda (Shurdeek) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ICQ 10236103, +436505122023
--
My mind is like a steel trap - rusty and illegal in 37 states.
msg02906/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
