On Fri, 17 May 2002 16:57:32 -0700 Allen Akin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There's a long history of controversy in the OpenGL community over the > question of "is a given feature accelerated?" This is because the <cut> Thanks. I enjoyed reading that, although it is all basically common sense :) My point with the tables I am trying to create is NOT for developers, but for users. Users dont care if 'feature X' has caveats or conditions as to its acceleration (generally speaking). They simply expect it will work in the 'common case'. well, now that covers things from a 'users' perspective - ie. from a 'what card should I buy? is it supported? what features should I tell my mates my new baby has?', point of view. Well, If you've been reading my other posts on the subject, you may have noticed I want to put a demos / applications section on the website. Sounds to me like glean is a PERFECT candidate. in fact, Im off to see what exactly glean is. see you later :) PS. anyone else who is reading... we still have NO specs for any card but the RADEON family... and Im not releasing the new website without specs for at least the cards I mentioned before :) _______________________________________________________________ Hundreds of nodes, one monster rendering program. Now that’s a super model! Visit http://clustering.foundries.sf.net/ _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
