Michael wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 01:59:31PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: > >>Michael wrote: >> >>>On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 12:59:23PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: >>> >>> >>>>So, I've been writing a sanity checker for the radeon dma stream. All >>>>going nicely & found one stupid bug already. >>>> >>>> >>>I'm struggling to see what the dyslexic bug is? It just looked like one of >>>the header files was wrong (but if you emit state from 0x1c4c onwards it >>>wouldn't have mattered anyway?) >>> >>>Unless I'm being loopy, the kernel (that's now emitting SE_COORD_FMT >>>directly) is using the header that has the value as 0x1c50 not 0x15c0 >>>which would have been happening anyway (and looks like the right value >>>because 0x15c0 is something for 2d colour compare) >>> >>The previous version emitted SE_CNTL and SE_COORD_FMT as if they were >>contiguous. >> >>#define RADEON_SE_CNTL 0x1c4c >>#define RADEON_SE_COORD_FMT 0x15c0 >> >>... they aren't ... >> > > Yeah, drivers/ati/radeon_reg.h says that, but the kernel uses > radeon_drv.h, which has 0x1c50? > > So you're still emitting to 0x1c50, which is either fine and it always > has been, or it's still buggy.
Argh... I think it's still buggy. Keith _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
