[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Jens - > > >>Can you try with the old libdri.a, but the new libdrm.a. That's where I >>would expect the dependency for the new drmCommand interface to be >>resolved. >> > > But that's exactly what the SF binary packages give you - they give > you a new libdrm.a as a matter of course, but not libdri.a. Updating > only libdrm.a doesn't seem to be good enough any more (used to work!) > - now there's a dependency on libdri.a too.
I think we'll have to add libdri.a to the binaries. I don't really see any way around this -- we want to distribute infrastructure improvements as well as driver ones. Keith ------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
