On Mit, 2002-09-18 at 18:00, Jens Owen wrote:
> Michel D�nzer wrote:
> > So, do we want to keep the trackers?
>
> It has been used in the past, but currently, most of the primary
> developers have *not* found it useful. I don't think anybody would be
> disappointed if it were turned off...at least for now.
>
> > If yes, I suggest a couple
> > improvements:
> >
> > * only allow submissions from logged in users
>
> If we keep it on, that's a good idea.
>
> > * send mails to dri-{devel,user} instead of dri-patches to get more
> > attention
>
> I was going to send a canned response to have the poster submit to
> dri-users. I didn't realize we could change the list these get posted
> on. I'm not sure we want these automatically posted. There appears to
> be less follow up on the submitters end via this route. That's why I
> think a push back to the submitter is just fine.
If we require login, we'd have at least a mail address to follow up to.
I think disabling the trackers would be better than a canned response
because users might get annoyed by the latter after having entered a
tracker entry.
--
Earthling Michel D�nzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts
on Hammer Technology! Open Source & Linux Developers, register now
for the AMD Developer Symposium. Code: EX8664
http://www.developwithamd.com/developerlab
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
