On Fre, 2002-09-27 at 18:51, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > >> > >>It's a big hack to be doing this.
BTW it also seems to work for him without writing to GEN_INT_CNTL all the time, i.e. only acknowledging the bits in GEN_INT_STATUS. Would that make it slightly less hackish? :) > >> I'd really like to know why this happens, > >> > > > > So would I. I suspect it's a workaround for some problem, it worked fine > > here without. (as I said on IRC yesterday: but then I have sane hardware > > :) > > > > > >>but in the mean time I'm ok to see it go in. > >> > > > > Okay, I'll commit it later tonight. > > > > > > > >>Maybe I should be more pedantic about things... > >> > > > > Well, I'd rather you wouldn't be speaking in riddles. > > Just about committing code that is a hack-around without really understanding > what's going on. I think it's more or less inevitable, however, with all the > different bits of hardware interacting with each other & us in the middle > trying to sort it out. Yeah, this is pretty complex stuff we're dealing with. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
