On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 06:08:37AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:34:33AM +0200, Felix Kühling wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:24:32 -0700
>> Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 
>> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 09:22:05PM +0200, Felix Kühling wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > > 
>> > > after upgrading to the merged XFree89 4.2.99.2 XFree86.0.log contains
>> > > this:
>> > > (**) RADEON(0): Display dimensions: (315, 236) mm
>> > > (**) RADEON(0): DPI set to (154, 154)
>> 
>> A bit further up in the log I found this:
>> (**) RADEON(0): Virtual size is 1920x1440 (pitch 1920)
>> 
>> Setting the virtual resolution explicitly in the Display subsection in
>> XF86Config-4 overrides this. After setting it to 1152x864 I noticed that
>> all higher resolution default modes were discarded, e.g: 
>> (II) RADEON(0): Not using default mode "1920x1440" (width too large for virtual 
>size)
>
>That sure sounds like a bug.  I think that will cause a lot of DRI users
>some irritation.  Does anybody know if this change in behavior was
>intentional?

It's a side-effect of the recent RandR additions.  It should be
resolved before too long.  In the meantime, you can specify the
virtual size explicitly.

David


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4729346;7592162;s?http://www.sun.com/javavote
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to