On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 09:38:20AM -0400, David Dawes wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 06:08:37AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote: > >On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:34:33AM +0200, Felix Kühling wrote: > >> On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:24:32 -0700 > >> Ian Romanick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 09:22:05PM +0200, Felix Kühling wrote: > >> > > Hi, > >> > > > >> > > after upgrading to the merged XFree89 4.2.99.2 XFree86.0.log contains > >> > > this: > >> > > (**) RADEON(0): Display dimensions: (315, 236) mm > >> > > (**) RADEON(0): DPI set to (154, 154) > >> > >> A bit further up in the log I found this: > >> (**) RADEON(0): Virtual size is 1920x1440 (pitch 1920) > >> > >> Setting the virtual resolution explicitly in the Display subsection in > >> XF86Config-4 overrides this. After setting it to 1152x864 I noticed that > >> all higher resolution default modes were discarded, e.g: > >> (II) RADEON(0): Not using default mode "1920x1440" (width too large for virtual >size) > > > >That sure sounds like a bug. I think that will cause a lot of DRI users > >some irritation. Does anybody know if this change in behavior was > >intentional? > > It's a side-effect of the recent RandR additions. It should be > resolved before too long. In the meantime, you can specify the > virtual size explicitly.
Ah. As long as it's fixed before 4.3.0, I won't be too irritated. :) Jose: When you start doing nightly builds again, could you make a release note for this? Otherwise, I fear we'll have a small flood of problem reports. -- Smile! http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap990315.html ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4729346;7592162;s?http://www.sun.com/javavote _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
