On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 04:32:03PM +0000, Keith Whitwell wrote: >Michel Dänzer wrote: >> On Don, 2002-11-07 at 16:56, Keith Whitwell wrote: >> >>>Michel Dänzer wrote: >>> >>>>These no longer get built by default. Any objections against the >>>>attached patch? >>>> >>>Actually if they're not built, I think we should ditch them from cvs. We're >>>not working on them. >>> >> >> In that case I'd vote again for removing unused drivers etc. as well. > >I'm ok with that too, as long as it simplifies rather than complicates the >lives of people who are doing XFree merges.
It would probably complicate things a little, if anything. It certainly wouldn't make it any easier. If the goal is to make the DRI CVS as small as possible, why not go all the way and turn it into an environment for building only the DRI-related modules? That would change the nature of XFree86 merges quite a bit, but that wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing. David ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
