On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 11:11:13AM -0600, D. Hageman wrote: > On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Alan Hourihane wrote: > > For 'stable DRM' you need to stick with XFree86 4.2.0 and the DRM modules > > that ship with 4.2.0. For 'DRM of the day' use the DRI trunk. > > I admit that your logic is sound, but answer me this: Does one send the > changes back on the stable to the XFree86 team proper or to the DRI team? > The two group devel model gets kinda unwieldy at this point. Right now > most vendors have to track the individual patches to XFree86 and DRI in > between releases ... and they kinda push the changes back into the code > base where they belong when they can.
I'd send stability changes directly to XFree86. Then the changes would go straight into the stable branch of XFree86. There's a close working relationship between the two groups anyway and if the XFree86 team want a quick response from the DRI folks on a patch they've received then that would happen. Alan. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
