On Don, 2002-12-19 at 14:39, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Currently, an arbitrary number of signals can be scheduled, potentially > exhausting kernel memory and/or causing lots of useless list traversal > in the interrupt handler. I guess the number of pending signals needs to > be limited, or is there a better way to handle this?
http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/drm-vblank-signal-nodos.diff limits the number of pending signals to 100 and only schedules a given signal for a given sequence number to a given process once. Feedback appreciated. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Geek Gift Procrastinating? Get the perfect geek gift now! Before the Holidays pass you by. T H I N K G E E K . C O M http://www.thinkgeek.com/sf/ _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
