My impression is that a patch trying to add a dlopen() call to one of the xfree86 hosted ddx drivers would be rejected.
Last I looked at the XF86 loader, it had some stuff in it that implied to me that it couldn't simply be treated as a wrapper for dlopen(), dlsym(), etc.
I don't remember the details right now.
Yes, the XFree86 modules aren't regular .so type shared objects -- but the thing we're interested in loading *is*, so we'd be forced to used dlopen() to get it in the server.
Keith
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
