On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 08:19:33PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 08:44:32PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > I wonder if it's really such a pressing problem though. > > Imagine you're working with somebody testing some code, but that person > has no CVS write access. After you checkin your changes what will you > gonna do: tell him to wait two or three days until the SF anonymous CVS > backup updates, or email him patches. Either way it sucks since it slows > development. > > > How many people have complained? > > I which it had been many - it would be sign of a lot people helping - > but the number it's nor everything. The current situation renders the > CVS useless for any serious testing.
See what I mean [below]? Jose Fonseca Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >CVS at sourceforge is using the backup server which has data that is >24+ hours old. I wasn't able to get it either. > >--- Maximo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Just a little question, Why can't a get the Savage-1_0_0-branch? I >> cat get >> the trunk, the savage-0-0-1-branch but i can't get this new one. CVS >> shows >> as if it was going to get but i keep waiting and i don't get anything >> except the directory xc/xc/CVS that's all I got. Did i miss >> something? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
