On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:53:29AM -0600, Otto Solares wrote: > Hi! > > I am trying to merge the r200 driver from dri-cvs to mesa-miniglx, > finally i had most files merged but i am finding heavy X dependencies > in header files in dri-cvs (eg radeon.h), it was not supposed dri > drivers should be backend agnostic? > > Is somebody working on resolving this situation? i think unified > dri drivers should be a common goal. > > And yes!, dri drivers should live in mesa tree instead of Xfree IMHO.
Indeed. I'm working on this at the moment. But being able to do this with a degree of cross code sharing is tricky. MiniGLX uses a subset of the current DDX driver mechanism's to initialize the DRI. It would be nice if that code can be shared. Before that can happen though, is that we need dynamic back/depth buffer creation - which is what I'm currently working on. In fact, I'll probably be creating a branch in the DRI CVS pretty soon. I've used the r200 driver as a basis for this work. Alan. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
