it's be nice if we could merge radeon and r200 into one driver when we did this as well.
Alex --- Alan Hourihane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:53:29AM -0600, Otto Solares wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I am trying to merge the r200 driver from dri-cvs to mesa-miniglx, > > finally i had most files merged but i am finding heavy X > dependencies > > in header files in dri-cvs (eg radeon.h), it was not supposed dri > > drivers should be backend agnostic? > > > > Is somebody working on resolving this situation? i think unified > > dri drivers should be a common goal. > > > > And yes!, dri drivers should live in mesa tree instead of Xfree > IMHO. > > Indeed. I'm working on this at the moment. But being able to do this > with a degree of cross code sharing is tricky. MiniGLX uses a subset > of the current DDX driver mechanism's to initialize the DRI. It would > be nice if that code can be shared. Before that can happen though, is > that we need dynamic back/depth buffer creation - which is what I'm > currently working on. > > In fact, I'll probably be creating a branch in the DRI CVS pretty > soon. > I've used the r200 driver as a basis for this work. > > Alan. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Dri-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
