On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 06:48, José Fonseca wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 01:27:32PM +0100, Felix Kühling wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:31:21 +0000
> > Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > > Ian Romanick wrote:
> > > > Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > > 
> > > >> On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 20:01, en ne wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> I send you the verbose output and the ldd output.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>         libexpat.so.1 => not found
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > This is getting old.  This makes at least 10 reports of "direct 
> > > > rendering not working" that turned out to be libexpat.so problems.  Are 
> > > > we or are we not staticly linking with libexpat for the nightly builds? 
> > > >  I seriously thought that this was resolved weeks ago.
> 
> No we aren't...
> 
> > > 
> > > If we're not going to link it statically, can we please use dlopen() and 
> > > dlsym() to get the expat functionality, and if it's not available, do nothing?
> > 
> > Apperently we're not linking statically with libexpat. This is really
> > only a snapshot problem, so doing this dlopen thing would be overkill.
> > As jfonseca doesn't seem to have much time to maintain the snapshots I'd
> > volunteer to setup a snapshot build on freedesktop.org that would link
> > statically with libexpat. I believe I could start building snapshots by
> > the end of this week. If someone's quicker than tat, go ahead ;-)
> 
> Sorry. I forgot to flag your reply describing how to link statically and
> never remembered the subject again (at that time I was more concerned
> with the build failure...) I'm taking care of it now.
> 
> Regarding puting the snapshot builds on freedesktop.org, I'm fine with
> it (it's true I've been quite busy with other stuff and that perhaps I
> can't give all the attention required)
> , but does it has the resources!?  
> 
> It takes about 2hrs in a 1.8GHz to
> build 3 branches, requiring about 600Mb of temporary hard-drive space to
> build a branch, plus 100Mb of permanent storage per-branch for the local
> CVS checkout. The latter can be ignored, since the repository is on the
> same machine, but the rest is not such a small deal for a machine which
> appears to be dedicated for web and CVS hosting...

It's a dual 2.8 P4 with hyperthreading, sitting essentially idle.  I
don't see any problem with running snapshots on it.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/anholt% df -m
Filesystem           1M-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/cciss/c0d0p7         9840      2400      6941  26% /
/dev/cciss/c0d0p8       146897     12940    133958   9% /home
/dev/cciss/c0d0p1          193        29       155  16% /boot

-- 
Eric Anholt                                [EMAIL PROTECTED]          
http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/         [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to