On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 12:25:23AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 21:41, Keith Whitwell wrote: > > Alan Hourihane wrote: > > > > > > Do we want to bring Mesa 6.0's branch into the DRI repository now or > > > stick with the way we have it currently ? > > > > > > I guess if we stick with the way it is now, then most developers will > > > track Mesa's trunk and we may start to lag stable releases. > > > > I like the way we have it now, to be truthful. If we develop on a branch or > > branches, we get little or no testing, and we really want testing. > > Agreed. What about a branch corresponding to the Mesa stable branch > though? Then David could grab that for XFree86. It's currently mesa_6_0_branch.
Alan. ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
