On Llu, 2004-03-01 at 16:28, Michel DÃnzer wrote: > For my part, I'd certainly prefer staying clear of the silly new > license. In the long run, I'd vote for moving the DRI X server code to a > freedesktop.org X server tree and the libGL code to Mesa or its own > xlibs module.
I'd definitely like to see this, and perhaps closer CVS integration so that DRI work can be done as a branch on the x.org tree not in a seperate tree. Assuming all the relevant powers that be can make it happen anyway Alan ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id56&alloc_id438&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
