On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 12:29:05PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
Stablizing the tree and getting something shipping that people can distribute is the first priority. I'm sure lots of people would like to see Mesa/DRI development more closely tied to X driver development so that there wasn't this 'big merge' problem to face every few months.
Precisely how that should work is something we can figure out in time. One key is to split responsibilities across stable interfaces so that we can ship modern drivers into existing distributions.
I feel a little bit like a shill here, but I figure I should throw out my two cents. First, a disclaimer: I work for BitMover but I do not set company policy; if you need to get The Official Word on things regarding BitMover or BK, you should talk to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
For DRI at least, it's been discussed & rejected.
Keith
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
