On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 17:39 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > That's what I'm thinking. That said, one possible solution would be for > the core to wait for the same number of interrupts as the duration of > the last wait before disabling the interrupt.
The core should get interrupts disabled as fast as possible; that increases the available sleep time for the CPU. Drivers for hardware without frame counters are welcome to delay the actual interrupt disable for a while if they like; they've got a tick running which will make it quite easy for them. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
-- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
