On 2/14/08, Stephane Marchesin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't know if it interferes, but I also can't see how your proposal deals
> > with this case.  Can you provide more details?  Just saying a BO has scanout
> > permission isn't sufficient either, since CRTC<->output mappings are
> > important too and not covered by BO permissions.
> >
>
> There is always the possibility of

Woops early-send clicking, sorry.

There is always the possibility of attaching those permissions
elsewhere. Technically I don't see what prevents you from attaching to
the BO.

Stephane

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to