On 2/14/08, Stephane Marchesin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't know if it interferes, but I also can't see how your proposal deals > > with this case. Can you provide more details? Just saying a BO has scanout > > permission isn't sufficient either, since CRTC<->output mappings are > > important too and not covered by BO permissions. > > > > There is always the possibility of
Woops early-send clicking, sorry. There is always the possibility of attaching those permissions elsewhere. Technically I don't see what prevents you from attaching to the BO. Stephane ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel