On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 18:14 -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 18:08 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > > > The only thing I'm concerned about is proper handling of 3D drawing to > > that big. What happens? > > It shouldn't work. We could require (in the X server) that DRI be > disabled to allocate a larger frame buffer if you like, but there's no > reason kernel space should restrict the size of the scanout area in case > someone wants to use the 3D engine.
I somehow managed to read this as a 2D patch. 100% agreement for the kernel. -- Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net eric.anh...@intel.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
-- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
