execwork to me was already master :) +1!
Tim On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > With git, working on a private copy of trunk is equivalent of the old style > working on a branch. > > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > The vision of the execwork branch was to maintain a development branch > > and then merge to master once we were happy with the quality and unit > > test completeness of the execwork stuff. However, it now appears that > > everyone is working in the execwork branch. Additionally, I've also > > had a number of offhand comments from those less familiar with the > > project who assume that a lack of commits on master means the project > > is less active than it is. As such, I propose that we merge the > > execwork branch back into master and continue to do our work there. > > With the lastest push of Ben's patches for ValueVectors and the merge > > of DRILL-140 into execwork, execwork includes all the changes in > > master and all tests pass. > > > > Jacques > > >
