+1...this will be very useful for fresh starters! On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]> wrote:
> The vision of the execwork branch was to maintain a development branch > and then merge to master once we were happy with the quality and unit > test completeness of the execwork stuff. However, it now appears that > everyone is working in the execwork branch. Additionally, I've also > had a number of offhand comments from those less familiar with the > project who assume that a lack of commits on master means the project > is less active than it is. As such, I propose that we merge the > execwork branch back into master and continue to do our work there. > With the lastest push of Ben's patches for ValueVectors and the merge > of DRILL-140 into execwork, execwork includes all the changes in > master and all tests pass. > > Jacques >
