Now the document has been modified, changing my vote: +1 (non-binding)
Julian On Oct 10, 2014, at 8:00 AM, Tomer Shiran <[email protected]> wrote: > The document should have had that sentence removed so that there's no > difference between merge scenario and normal commit scenario. I fixed it > now. > > I assume everyone else voted based on the assumption that this was removed, > as it was discussed on the list, so I won't restart the vote unless someone > really wants to. Anyone can, of course, change their vote prior to the vote > closing. > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Tomer said that it makes sense to remove ", unless the code change >> represents a merge from a branch, in which case three +1s are required” but >> the bylaws still contain that clause. >> >> -1 (non-binding) >> >> Julian >> >> >> On Oct 9, 2014, at 2:56 PM, Tomer Shiran <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> In order for Drill to graduate to a TLP, we need to finalize the project's >> bylaws. I am restarting the vote here based on the feedback and discussions >> on the list: >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DRILL/Proposed+Bylaws >> >> The vote will be open for 72 hours. It will close on Oct 12, 3pm PT. I will >> then send out the TLP graduation vote. >> >> [ ] +1 >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1 >> >> Please indicate whether your vote is binding or non-binding. >> >> Thanks, >> Tomer >>
