I am not re-sending my vote to prevent a double count, but I am re-affirming my previous vote given the small change.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: > Now the document has been modified, changing my vote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Julian > > On Oct 10, 2014, at 8:00 AM, Tomer Shiran <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The document should have had that sentence removed so that there's no > > difference between merge scenario and normal commit scenario. I fixed it > > now. > > > > I assume everyone else voted based on the assumption that this was > removed, > > as it was discussed on the list, so I won't restart the vote unless > someone > > really wants to. Anyone can, of course, change their vote prior to the > vote > > closing. > > > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Tomer said that it makes sense to remove ", unless the code change > >> represents a merge from a branch, in which case three +1s are required” > but > >> the bylaws still contain that clause. > >> > >> -1 (non-binding) > >> > >> Julian > >> > >> > >> On Oct 9, 2014, at 2:56 PM, Tomer Shiran <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> In order for Drill to graduate to a TLP, we need to finalize the > project's > >> bylaws. I am restarting the vote here based on the feedback and > discussions > >> on the list: > >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DRILL/Proposed+Bylaws > >> > >> The vote will be open for 72 hours. It will close on Oct 12, 3pm PT. I > will > >> then send out the TLP graduation vote. > >> > >> [ ] +1 > >> [ ] +0 > >> [ ] -1 > >> > >> Please indicate whether your vote is binding or non-binding. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Tomer > >> > >
