Dan Mick wrote:
Paul Durrant wrote:
On 17/05/07, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I'd like to see a day when the Ethernet drivers on my systems don't
just spam the logs.  Am I alone in that?


Nope. I find it very irritating too - particularly because it's not
consistent spamming either; some drivers do it and others don't.
Given that dladm show-dev will give link up/down information (although
currently only to root) then there really should be no need to go
looking in the logs for current link status; and Nemo could log link
status on a driver's behalf for posterity, without troubling the
console.

 Paul


Me Too. I think drivers should never print link status messages to either
log or console, especially since dladm can query it reliably.
Paul makes a good point about posterity - that's really what I think about when deciding if/when/how to log messages from a driver or driver-subsystem. I've
never understood why some drivers insist on logging link-status, much less
announcing it to the console. I'm sure there was a once a situation where it
came in handy, but I do not know what it was.

I'm more tolerant of information that is likely to be interesting post-mortem and is only logged once, during startup, for example, the firmware revision in an adapter, or the versions of the ACPI tables in a machine. This information can usually be found via alternative methods, but it is sure convenient to scarf it out of /var/adm/messages, particularly when a community member is attempting to email bits of information
to diagnose something remotely.

Dana



_______________________________________________
driver-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/driver-discuss

Reply via email to