"Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Compatibility must be useful to be valuable, compatibility with
> unfinalised OpenSolaris distributions isn't very useful, while
> compatibility with Solaris is extremely useful given ISV support.

Fine, then "Solaris Express" behavior cannot create facts as this is
an unfinalized distribution. 

> As such, it makes sense for Sun to be the primary definer of compatibility.

Compatibility should be defined by the people who contribute ideas and code and 
who do things first, not by Sun unless Solaris is not really open.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]                (uni)  
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]     (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
driver-discuss mailing list
driver-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/driver-discuss

Reply via email to