On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Garrett D'Amore wrote:

> Generally, don't include the PSARC case number in wx comments for integration 
> of sfe if sfe has already been integrated (it has).
>
> sfe.c: line 902, extra blank line added.
> sfe.c: line 1170: I guess these changes are to avoid side effects from reads?
> sfe.c: line 1188, 1243, 1296, 1450: These are not for CR 6655415, but fix 
> another bug, please CR it separately
> sfe.c: line 1268 is yet another, separate bug fixed, and also needs its own 
> CR (seems a few dp38165 changes)
> sfe.c: line 1644 - is this yet another bug fix?
> sfe.c: line 1654-1699, this is new functionality a different part, another CR
> sfe_util.c: the changes here look like yet other, unrelated changes (and 
> there are more than one in here)
> sfe_util.c: line 1066, looks fishy to me.  why does now need to be nonzero? 
> suggests that maybe a problem exists *elsewhere* that this is just a bandaid 
> for?

Thanks, I will go through these later this evening.

Some of these Qs will be for Masa.

> There are a lot of changes here... too many for me to finish right now.  I 
> got to line 1300ish in sfe_util.c.  I strongly suggest you fix up your bug 
> lists, because at the moment there are a lot of fixes in here, and I'm having 
> a hard time seeing all of the reasons for all of them.
>
> In the future, smaller, more incremental updates, are a lot easier to manage, 
> rather than trying to collect up a few dozen fixes into a single 
> mondo-update.

I would have loved to provide you with a smaller, more incremental update, 
however we were having problems passing the tests, and a lot of been 
changing in the meantime as we move through getting a stable driver.

As it was, we've been held up from doing the putback as sparc had some 
regressions, and while probably not used on sparc, I couldn't prove that 
to jbeck. So, some of the changes are an artifact of that.

Thanks for your help/comments though, seriously, I am sure that Masa will 
be glad to get this putback.

--

Alan DuBoff - Solaris x86 IHV/OEM Group
_______________________________________________
driver-discuss mailing list
driver-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/driver-discuss

Reply via email to