Alan DuBoff wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>
>> So maybe instead of a gazillion different CRs, you could just do a
>> single CR saying "incorporate changes from upstream supplier". I'd
>> still like to have some explanation in that CR for what all the
>> changes are for, but you can coordinate with Masa to get the details.
>>
>> (Of course, listing all the CRs individually is even better, but I do
>> recognize it is potentially a fair bit more effort.)
>
> Garrett,
>
> It looks like I can change a CR as fix-delivered.
That's a bad idea, unless you actually delivered a *fix* by putting back
into ON!
>
> I think I should file another CR for all the bug fixes which Masa
> creates a list of, and then just mark this one fixed-delivered...and
> refer to the new CR in this old one. New list would include the
> auto-negotiate bug of course.
A better solution is to mark the old CR a duplicate. Or better, just
have two CRs, one for this problem, and one for all the others. (You
can putback multiple CRs in a single RTI/putback.)
-- Garrett
>
> Does that sound ok?
>
> --
>
> Alan DuBoff - Solaris x86 IHV/OEM Group
_______________________________________________
driver-discuss mailing list
driver-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/driver-discuss
