* Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuzn...@redhat.com> wrote:

> Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuzn...@redhat.com> writes:
> > Changes since v9:
> > - Rebase to 4.13-rc3.
> > - Drop PATCH1 as it was already taken by Greg to char-misc tree. There're no
> >   functional dependencies on this patch so the series can go through a 
> > different tree
> >   (and it actually belongs to x86 if I got Ingo's comment right).
> > - Add in missing void return type in PATCH1 [Colin King, Ingo Molnar, Greg 
> > KH]
> > - A few minor fixes in what is now PATCH7: add pr_fmt, tiny style fix in
> >   hyperv_flush_tlb_others() [Andy Shevchenko]
> > - Fix "error: implicit declaration of function 'virt_to_phys'" in PATCH2
> >   reported by kbuild test robot (#include <asm/io.h>)
> > - Add Steven's 'Reviewed-by:' to PATCH9.
> Thomas, Ingo, Greg,
> do I get it right that the intention is to take this series through x86
> tree? (See: https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2561174.html) If so,
> is there anything else I need to do to get it accepted?

Yeah, the patches are arch/x86/-heavy, so that would be the ideal workflow - 
just that the series coincided with x86 maintainers vacation time!

I've picked them up now into tip:x86/platform (they look good to me) and will 
them out after some testing.


devel mailing list

Reply via email to