Hi Brian and Mark,
On Jul 16, 2008, at 1:03 AM, Brian Aker wrote:
So to me these need to be set:
error= setsockopt(ptr->fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_LINGER,
&linger, (socklen_t)sizeof(struct linger));
error= setsockopt(ptr->fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDTIMEO,
&waittime, (socklen_t)sizeof(struct timeval));
error= setsockopt(ptr->fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO,
&waittime, (socklen_t)sizeof(struct timeval));
(void)fcntl(ptr->fd, F_SETFL, flags | O_NONBLOCK);
What I don't quite understand is, why use non-blocking I/O?
This would be like polling the connection. But after setting a timeout
you shouldn't need to poll.
Another thing:
Have you considered using c10k and a pool of threads?
(although a THD would still be associated with a particular connection)
I have heard of patches for MySQL that do this, but supporting both
methods just makes things complex.
So what is the best method in your opinion?
Regards,
Paul
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
