Paul McCullagh wrote: > Hi Brian and Mark, > > On Jul 16, 2008, at 1:03 AM, Brian Aker wrote: > >> So to me these need to be set: >> error= setsockopt(ptr->fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_LINGER, >> &linger, (socklen_t)sizeof(struct linger)); >> error= setsockopt(ptr->fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDTIMEO, >> &waittime, (socklen_t)sizeof(struct timeval)); >> error= setsockopt(ptr->fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVTIMEO, >> &waittime, (socklen_t)sizeof(struct timeval)); >> (void)fcntl(ptr->fd, F_SETFL, flags | O_NONBLOCK); > > What I don't quite understand is, why use non-blocking I/O? > > This would be like polling the connection. But after setting a timeout > you shouldn't need to poll. > > Another thing: > > Have you considered using c10k and a pool of threads?
FYI, this is precisely what the MySQL Proxy does/solves. Does it make sense to do this in the microkernel itself or external to it? Or both... -jay > (although a THD would still be associated with a particular connection) > > I have heard of patches for MySQL that do this, but supporting both > methods just makes things complex. > > So what is the best method in your opinion? > > Regards, > > Paul > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
