On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 07:30 -0700, Mark Atwood wrote: > There ARE non-transactional engines! > > Requiring that user accessible engines must be transactional is too > high a bar. > > Plus, "log to table" will require CSV.
for the benefit of those not walking the streets of Portland... my
comment on non-transactional engines were:
- we could provide an interface to help implementing table locks
- OR... in the breaking of existing apps (of which we have none for
Drizzle remember), we could instead of sleeping on lock, return
temporary error. application must then retry.
- NDB does this.
--
Stewart Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.flamingspork.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
