Hi!
I do not know if you are kidding or not :)
I will take this as a serious question:
1) It is human hackable (good or bad)
2) I have never gotten the impression it is fast.
3) Why when we already have SQL? I suspect it is a coin toss as to
which is faster
4) I once had a co-worker that drove me nuts about YAML and that still
rings in my ears (he BTW was probably right at the time).
To me YAML, or JSON, are better then XML.
We could fix performance by simply moving to message sending/avoid a
cache design. I do not see the table cache as the future, and wold
just as soon remove it sooner then later.
Cheers,
-Brian
BTW dipping into the future a bit, I suspect we will touch on non-SQL
data, so I see SQL as a "specific" solution and not a generic/propel
us into the future solution. We need it for "CREATE TABLE", but
otherwise? Not so interesting.
On Aug 1, 2008, at 2:18 PM, Jim Winstead wrote:
what about yaml?
http://www.yaml.org/
jim
--
_______________________________________________________
Brian "Krow" Aker, brian at tangent.org
Seattle, Washington
http://krow.net/ <-- Me
http://tangent.org/ <-- Software
_______________________________________________________
You can't grep a dead tree.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
