On Monday 04 August 2008 13:37:25 Mats Kindahl wrote: > The format I am considering is basically a combined redo-undo log. This > would mean that it would be possible to run the log both backwards and > forwards, so the situation you describe could easily be solved by > running the log backwards and then start replication from a different > position, effectively skipping a set of events.
If statements were bytecode, you could use the command pattern and distribute the bytecode to replicants. -- c _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
