Hi Jeremy, Mats On 22/08/2008, at 1:59 AM, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
Does it make sense to explicitly record the database(s) and/or table(s) involved in a statement. I don't know how common it is to filter replication based on one or both of those, but I tend to encounter it WAY more than I'd expect to...
It'd be great if a slave could give a master a ruleset for this, so it doesn't have to drag across everything before filtering. So, I like the idea of explicitly recording the dbs/tables involved in a query (and not just the current default db), but more for the benefit of the master being able to filter before sending it to an individual slave, rather than having all the extra info go across the wire too.
Regards, Arjen. -- Arjen Lentz, Founder @ Open Query Training and Expertise for MySQL in Australia and New Zealand http://openquery.com.au/training/ (ph. +61-7-3103 0809) _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
