On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 03:06:40PM +0900, Yoshinori Matsunobu wrote: > The size was 2700MB. When I converted to local encoding (EUC-JP), > the size was 2013MB.
What if each of the text fields was gzipped? If using --fast option, shouldn't have much of a performance penalty (and can possibly be a huge win in caching). My theory is that compressed text fields give a bigger win than more efficient encodings... but it's just a theory at the moment :) -- Stewart Smith _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
