On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 06:05:48PM -0700, Brian Aker wrote: > Easy :) > > For some reason I thought we had talked about this. Give me queries and > an id block to return results back to a client and we can have parallel > query. I favor reserving four bytes in the header for this. We might have > an issue with transaction context depending on the engine (I need to look > into this still).
Cool! We had talked about this before, and I mentioned it in the protocol email to the list, but I wasn't sure how difficult the server changes would be (I've not dug into that code yet). I'm going to make time for the new protocol document this weekend and will include the changes to support this. -Eric _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
