Brian Aker wrote:
H!
On Oct 13, 2008, at 12:01 AM, Roy Lyseng wrote:
You are misunderstanding me: What I mean is that when you have
multiple threads running on behalf of a session, such as when you
have multiple concurrent queries/statements running, then you need to
synchronize more heavily on the session level.
You are right if you think about transaction context. The thing is
most web shops, almost all, run in autocommit mode. This is the 80%
case (if not more). Of course when you run within the context of a
transaction you have an issue, I mentioned that in my original email,
but the majority case does not do this. They fire off seven queries,
get the results, and then build a page.
Gosh, Brian, that's a pretty good argument for an aggregating
interface. Of course then they would have a single transaction and the
results would even be consistent.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
